Order Execution

Supported Order types

All market standard order types are available, i.e. Market, Limit and Stops.

Trailing Stops, where the Stop level moves in line with the market price, are supported for all Stop order types. 

All Stop and Limit orders can be placed as either:

  • Day Order – automatically expires at the end of the giving business day (i.e. at 17:00 EST - New York Eastern Standard Time).
  • Good till Cancelled (GTC) – order stays open until cancelled or when filled.
  • Good till Date (GTD) – order automatically expires at the end of a selected business day (i.e. at 17:00 EST).

Market Orders

A Market Order, for a currency pair and amount within the streaming liquidity, is treated in the same way as if you are requesting to trade FX spot directly from a Trading Module (i.e. 'Trade on Quote') with the exception that a Market order will never be rejected (but therefore can result in a slippage).

Market Orders are almost always filled at the current available price for the given amount.

Limit Orders

Limit orders are used to take profit or to enter the market at a certain price level:

  • Limit orders to buy can only be placed below the current market price.
  • Limit orders to sell - can only be placed above the current market price.
  • Aggressive' Limits - Saxo Bank allows for the placement of slightly in the money limits (for clients to use as a limited Market order) - the tolerance is currently set at 0.05% away from the relevant market price.

Limit orders are generally filled at the limit price. However, they may be filled at a better price during larger market gaps, for instance during the market opening period (Monday, 05:00 Sydney time) or during news events. Limit orders are never filled at a price worse than the original limit price.

Stop Orders

Stop Orders are typically used to limit losses at a certain price level. Stop orders are typically filled at the stop level selected by the client, except for 'Buy Stop if Bid' and 'Sell Stop if Offered' where the fill is done on the opposite side of the spread from the stop level. These orders are typically filled at the stop level adjusted for the spread at the time.

Stop Orders are filled on transparent prices and the majority of orders are filled at the expected level set by the client. Please visit our Historical Stop Order fill statistics here.

Stop if Bid / Stop if Offered

Stop if Bid orders are typically used to limit losses on short positions. Stop if Offered orders are typically used to limit losses on long positions. This is to prevent orders from being triggered just because of a temporary large spread (maybe for a split of a second).
 
Saxo Bank therefore encourages you to only use Stop if Bid for Buy orders and Stop if Offered for Sell orders.

To help you select the right Stop order type, the 'FX Order' Ticket on the platforms automatically defaults to Stop if Bid for Buy and Stop if Offered for Sell orders unless you actively change it before placing the order.

  • Stop if Bid orders to buy are when triggered most often filled at the order level plus the client spread. During volatile markets with price gaps, orders may be slipped to the current market offer price. 
  • Stop if Offered orders to sell are when triggered most often filled at the stop order level minus the client spread. During volatile markets with price gaps, orders may be slipped to the current market bid price. 
  • Stop if Bid orders to sell are when triggered filled at the client Bid price at the time.
  • Stop if Offered orders to buy are when triggered filled at the client Offer price at the time.

The use of Stop-if-Offered orders to buy or Stop-if-Bid orders to sell for Forex positions can result in positions being prematurely closed if a market event causes the Bid/Ask spread to widen for a short duration.

Saxo Bank's order management system has certain client protection mechanisms in place that ensures that the vast majority of orders are filled without any slippage. See the Stop order fill statistics.

Automatic Order fill

The vast majority of FX orders placed with Saxo Bank are filled automatically without any manual intervention from the dealing desk. 

For very large orders, during very volatile market conditions (for example during release of key economic figures) and in certain non-streaming currency pairs, manual review from the dealing desk is performed.

Manual Order fill

Typically, only a very small proportion of orders placed with Saxo Bank require manual intervention. These orders are either too large in size for automatic execution for that particular currency pair, in an illiquid currency pair without streaming price or it is  such that there are high volatile and/or illiquid market conditions.

During illiquid market conditions there are fewer market participants and thus dealers will need to check the price and also that the desired trade amount is actually available in the market. For some currency pairs, all orders might be filled manually. This could be due to very low trading volumes / liquidity in a particular pair.​

​ ​ ​
Updated 10 February, 2016
​​
​ ​

Historical FX Stop Order Fill Statistics​

Order Fill Statistics

The tables below details Saxo Bank’s performance in filling client Stop Orders on the major currency pairs.

  • The data is for all Stop Orders.
  • Limit Orders are not included in the data because they are filled at the order level or better.
  • Market Orders are also not included because they are filled at best available price when executed.

Q1 2016 - ​1. January to 31. March 2016

​PAIRNUMBER OF ORDERSNUMBER OF ORDERS SEEING SLIPPAGEPERCENTAGE FILLED WITH NO SLIPAVERAGE SLIPPAGE IN PIPSMEDIAN SLIPPAGE IN PIPS
AUDUSD 7,98710299%0.00.0
EURCHF 284299%0.00.0
EURGBP 2,0466100%0.00.0
EURJPY 2,9873199%0.00.0
EURUSD35,934 61698%0.10.0
GBPUSD10,56144100%0.00.0
USDCHF 1,8946100%0.00.0
USDJPY20,902 36798%0.00.0

Q4 2015 - 1. October to 31. December 2015

Pair

Number of orders

Number of orders seeing slippage

Percentage filled with no slip

Average slippage in pips

Median slippage in pips

AUDUSD

6,534

179

97%

0.1

0.0

EURCHF

623

4

99%

0.0

0.0

EURGBP

1,434

7

100%

0.0

0.0

EURJPY

2,578

49

98%

0.1

0.0

EURUSD

41,885

1,856

96%

0.4

0.0

GBPUSD

7,139

253

96%

0.2

0.0

USDCHF

1,479

21

99%

0.1

0.0

USDJPY

10,017

487

95%

0.4

0.0

Q3 2015 - 1. July to 30. September 2015

Pair

Number of orders

Number of orders seeing slippage

Percentage filled with no slip

Average slippage in pips

Median slippage in pips

AUDUSD

7,230

244

97%

0.1

0.0

EURCHF

365

2

99%

0.0

0.0

EURGBP

1,501

5

100%

0.0

0.0

EURJPY

3,864

27

99%

0.0

0.0

EURUSD

47,974

2,561

95%

0.1

0.0

GBPUSD

8,073

224

97%

0.2

0.0

USDCHF

1,095

7

99%

0.0

0.0

USDJPY

14,405

929

94%

0.1

0.0

Q2 2015 - 1. April to 30. June 2015

Pair​​​Number of orders​Number of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no ​​​​slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median Slippage in pips
AUDUSD​9,103 37496%​0.20.0
​EURCHF2511100%0.0​0.0
​EURGBP1,816 26​99%​0.10.0
​EURJPY4,859 45​99%0.00.0
​EURUSD​85,1944,517 95%​0.1​0.0
​GBPUSD12,690 417​97%​0.30.0
​USDCHF1,021 ​14 ​99%​0.1​0.0
​USDJPY12,925 ​525 ​96%​0.2​0.0
 

Q1 2015 - ​1. January to 31. March 2015

​​Pair​​​Number of orders​Number of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median Slippage in pips
AUDUSD​10,038 ​​​420 96%​0.10.0
​EURCHF1,869 300 84%16.1​0.0
​EURGBP1,615 5 ​100%​0.00.0
​EURJPY7,690 93​99%0.00.0
​EURUSD​83,271 4,610 94%​0.0​0.0
​GBPUSD12,184 283 ​98%​0.10.0
​USDCHF1,401 ​91 ​94%​9.4​0.0
​USDJPY29,973 ​1,100 ​96%​0.0​0.0
 

Q4 2014 - 1. October to 31. December 2014

​Pair​​​Number of orders​Number of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median Slippage in pips
AUDUSD​5,449​​304 ​94%​0.10.0
​EURCHF​289 ​1 100%​0.0​0.0
​EURGBP950​7 ​99%​0.00.0
​EURJPY2,99025 ​99%0.00.0
​EURUSD​36,585 1,531 ​96%​0.0​0.0
​GBPUSD6,225 306 ​95%​0.10.0
​USDCHF660 ​8 ​99%​0.0​0.0
​USDJPY35,518 ​3,018 ​92%​0.0​0.0
 

Q3 2014 - 1. July to 30. September 2014

​Pair​​​Number of orders​Number of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median Slippage in pips
AUDUSD​7,553 ​​4​76 ​94%​0.10.0
​EURCHF​535 ​3 ​99%​0.0​0.0
​EURGBP1,648 ​10 ​99%​0.00.0
​EURJPY3,576 25 ​99%0.00.0
​EURUSD​38,339 1,113 ​97%​0.1​0.0
​GBPUSD12,632 910 ​93%​0.10.0
​USDCHF1,300 ​17 ​99%​0.1​0.0
​USDJPY17,537 ​400 ​98%​0.0​0.0
 

Q2 2014 - 1. April to 30. June 2014

​PairNumber of ordersNumber of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median slippage in pips
AUDUSD
7,413
349
95%
0.1
0.0
EURCHF
440
7
98%
0.2
0.0
EURGBP
1,270
14
99%
0.1
0.0
EURJPY
7,210
281
96%
0.1
0.0
EURUSD
41,023
1,116
97%
0.0
0.0
GBPUSD
9,480
477
95%
0.1
0.0
USDCHF
2,007
12
99%
0.0
0.0
USDJPY
16,063
519
97%
0.1
0.0

Q1 2014 - 1. January to 31. March 2014

​PairNumber of ordersNumber of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median slippage in pips
AUDUSD
12,360
637
95%
0.1
0.0
EURCHF
844
4
100%
0.0
0.0
EURGBP
2,317
18
99%
0.0
0.0
EURJPY
8,299
61
99%
0.0
0.0
EURUSD
50,989
968
98%
0.1
0.0
GBPUSD
14,548
1,106
92%
0.1
0.0
USDCHF
3,444
32
99%
0.1
0.0
USDJPY
31,394
765
98%
0.1
0.0

Q4 2013 - 1. October to 31. December 2013

​PairNumber of ordersNumber of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median slippage in pips
AUDUSD9,75048495%​0.1​0.0​
EURCHF​8182100%​0.0​0.0​
EURGBP1,55836​98%​0.1​0.0​
EURJPY​6,36337​99%​0.0​0.0​
EURUSD​59,4431,648​97%​0.1​0.0​
GBPUSD13,84778494%​0.20.0​
USDCHF​3,68542​99%​0.1​0.0​
USDJPY​24,795786​97%​0.10.0​

Q3 2013 - 1. July to 30. September 2013

​PairNumber of ordersNumber of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median slippage in pips
AUDUSD14,932​1,293​91%​0.7​0.0​
EURCHF​735 ​599%​0.0​0.0​
EURGBP1,909​43​98%​0.1​0.0​
EURJPY​7,401​132​98%​0.0​0.0​
EURUSD​60,866​2,133​96%​0.1​0.0​
GBPUSD13,731​85394%​0.0​0.0​
USDCHF​3,060​49​98%​0.1​0.0​
USDJPY​43,716​3,415​92%​0.2​0.0​

Q2 2013 - 1. April to 30. June 2013

​PairNumber of ordersNumber of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median slippage in pips
AUDUSD​14,931 ​817 ​95%​0.1​0.0​
EURCHF​1,233 ​23 ​98%​0.1​0.0​
EURGBP1,727 ​6​100%​0.0​0.0​
EURJPY​23,095 ​1,770​92%​0.1​0.0​
EURUSD​78,384 ​1,751​98%​0.0​0.0​
GBPUSD13,535 ​42297%​0.0​0.0​
USDCHF​3,692 ​24​99%​0.0​0.0​
USDJPY​62,208 ​3,659​94%​-0.1​0.0​

Q1 2013 - 1. January to 31. March 2013

​PairNumber of ordersNumber of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median slippage in pips
AUDUSD​7,377 ​161​98%​0.0​0.0​
EURCHF​1,641 ​9​99%​0.0​0.0​
EURGBP​2,506 ​8​100%​0.0​0.0​
EURJPY​43,913 ​5,618 ​87%​0.0​0.0​
EURUSD​93,576 ​2,296 ​98%​0.0​0.0​
GBPUSD​15,718 ​1,434 ​91%​0.0​0.0​
USDCHF​2,051 ​4​100%​0.0​0.0​
USDJPY​28,633 ​1,928 ​93%​0.0​0.0​

Q4 2012 - 1. October to 31. December 2012

​PairNumber of ordersNumber of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median slippage in pips
AUDUSD​6,837​201​97%​0.1​0.0​
EURCHF​262​1​100%​0.0​0.0​
EURGBP​1,121​–​100%​0.0​0.0​
EURJPY​8,711​53​99%​0.0​0.0​
EURUSD​69,334​906​99%​0.0​0.0​
GBPUSD​6,536​18​100%​0.0​0.0​
USDCHF​1,046​4​100%​0.0​0.0​
USDJPY​13,859​293​98%​0.1​0.0​

Q3 2012 – 1. July to 30. September 2012

​PairNumber of ordersNumber of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median slippage in pips
AUDUSD​12,425​408​97%​0.1​0​
EURCHF​435​37​91%​0.2​0​
EURGBP​1,244​6​100%​0​0​
EURJPY​6,885​77​99%​0​0​
EURUSD​95,858​2,747​97%​0.1​0​
GBPUSD​8,162​67​99%​0​0​
USDCHF​1,765​5​100%​0​0​
USDJPY​8,534​249​97%​0.1​0​

Q2 2012 - 1. April to 30. June 2012

​PairNumber of ordersNumber of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​​Average slippage in pips​Median slippage in pips
AUDUSD​13,565​593​96%​0.2​0​
EURCHF​774​19​98%​0.0​0​
EURGBP​1,544​33​98%​0.0​0​
EURJPY​7,223​208​97%​0.1​0​
EURUSD​99,095​2,203​98%​0.0​0​
GBPUSD​8,971​354​96%​0.1​0​
USDCHF​2,929​45​98%​0.0​0​
USDJPY​11,612​276​98%​0.1​0​

Q1 2012 - 1. January to 31. March 2012

​Pair​​Number of orders​Number of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median Slippage in pips
AUDUSD​​13,757​143​99%​0.1​0
​EURCHF​1,579​3​100%​0.0​0
​EURGBP​1,693​1​100%​0.0​0
​EURJPY​6,13117​100%​0.0​0
​EURUSD​127,224​858​99%​0.0​0
​GBPUSD​8,773​89​99%​0.0​0
​USDCHF​3,722​13​100%​0.0​0
​USDJPY​10,643​20​100%​0.0​0
 

Q4 2011 - 1. October to 31. December 2011

​Pair​​Number of orders​Number of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median Slippage in pips
AUDUSD​15,832​​302​98%​0.1​0
​EURCHF​3,822​69​98%​0.2​0
​EURGBP2,033​8​100%​0.0​0
​EURJPY5,426108​98%​0.2​0
​EURUSD​116,8331,615​99%​0.1​0
​GBPUSD8,822237​97%​0.1​0
​USDCHF4,049​51​99%​0.1​0
​USDJPY4,558​237​95%​0.4​0
 

Q3 2011 - 1. July to 30. September 2011

​Pair​​Number of orders​Number of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median Slippage in pips
AUDUSD​12,508​​140​99%​0.1​0
​EURCHF​15,360​420​97%​0.2​0
​EURGBP2,305​23​99%​0.1​0
​EURJPY7,590147​98%​0.2​0
​EURUSD​114,4231,291​99%​0.0​0
​GBPUSD9,920286​97%​0.2​0
​USDCHF7,609​301​96%​0.6​0
​USDJPY8,997​288​97%​0.2​0
 

H1 2011 - 1. January to 30. June 2011

​Pair​​Number of orders​Number of orders seeing slippage​Percentage filled with no slippage​Average slippage in pips​Median Slippage in pips
AUDUSD​21,855​​1,866​91%​0.1​0
​EURCHF​11,900​1,761​85%​0.2​0
​EURGBP6,354​741​88%​0.1​0
​EURJPY18,7301,860​90%​0.2​0
​EURUSD​234,61917,647​92%​0.2​0
​GBPUSD27,8623,319​88%​0.2​0
​USDCHF12,113​1,812​85%​0.2​0
​USDJPY20,174​2,071​90%​0.2​0
 

Note:

Actual fill levels will always differ from order levels by the amount of the client spread for orders placed on the opposite side of the spread (i.e., buy if bid and sell if offered).  In these cases, therefore, slippage is calculated as that beyond the expected amount given the actual bid/offer spread.  For orders placed on the same side of the spread (i.e., sell if bid and buy if offered), slippage is calculated as the full realized difference between fill and order rates.

Product Risk

Danish banks are required to categorise investment products offered to retail clients depending on the product’s complexity and risk as: green, yellow or red.

Forex is categorised as a red product as it is considered an investment product with a high complexity and a high risk. See also the 'Product Risk Categorisation' located under our General Business Terms.

General Business Terms